Home

Services

SEO Services Social Media Website Development AI Automation About Reviews Portfolio Blog Contact Free Social Media Audit
Social Media for Professional Services

The People With an Audience Will Not Post. The People Who Will, Do Not Have One.

Your partners have the reputation, the relationships and every hour of their week already sold. Your junior team has the time, the enthusiasm and, to a prospective client, no standing yet. Every professional-services social plan collides with that, and most of them resolve it by producing a firm account that posts award announcements and is read by nobody outside the building.

No credit card required · 30-minute call · No obligation to sign up

12+ years in digital marketing Working with Professional Services businesses
✓ In-House Content Studio ✓ Quoted & reported in USD ($) ★★★★★ Trustpilot 5.0 ★★★★★ Google 4.9
Colleagues in a meeting room at a professional services firm
The real constraintWho will post
Client names used without permissionNone
The Numbers First

Six reasons the firm account reads like a noticeboard

Every one of these is a genuine constraint rather than an excuse, which is why the usual advice does not survive contact with a professional firm.

  • Partner time is literally billableAn hour posting is an hour not billed
  • Most work cannot be describedConfidential, and that is not negotiable
  • Being wrong in public is costlyReasonably · it is your expertise
  • Nobody wants to seem to be sellingA real cultural constraint here
  • Juniors have no standing yetWhatever the content quality
  • So the firm account posts awardsWhich nobody outside reads

The third row is the one that quietly decides everything. A partner who commits to a position in public has committed to it in front of clients, opponents and their own colleagues — and being publicly wrong about your own specialism is a genuine professional cost, not a squeamishness. Any plan that treats it as reluctance to be overcome will fail, because the caution is correct.

Straight Talk

Take dictation, and stop asking partners to write

The arrangement that works in professional services is not a content calendar, it is an interview. Twenty minutes on a call, recorded, where somebody who knows the subject talks about a question they have been asked repeatedly this month. We turn that into four or five posts in their voice, they read them and change what is wrong, and it goes out under their name. Twenty minutes of partner time produces a month of material, and the alternative — asking them to write — has been tried at your firm already and you know how it went.

The confidentiality constraint is real and it is also less limiting than it appears. You cannot describe the matter, and you can describe the pattern: the mistake that keeps appearing in a type of contract, the thing people misunderstand about a deadline, the question that arrives too late to be useful. That is the most valuable content a professional firm can publish and none of it identifies anybody.

On being wrong in public, the answer is to be specific about scope rather than vague about substance. “This is how it usually works, and here is the situation where it does not” is a defensible sentence and a more useful one than either a confident overstatement or a hedged paragraph that says nothing. That framing is also what makes partners willing, which is the practical point.

And the firm account should stop trying to be a person. Its job is the practical stuff — deadlines, changes people need to know about, where to find things, what the firm actually does — while the individuals carry the thinking. Trying to give a logo a personality is how the noticeboard happens.

  • Interview, do not commission writing — Twenty minutes recorded produces a month of posts.
  • Describe the pattern, never the matter — The recurring mistake, the misunderstood deadline. Identifies nobody.
  • Be specific about scope — "Usually this, except when" is defensible and more useful than hedging.
  • The firm account does the practical — Deadlines, changes, where to find things. Not personality.
  • Juniors research, partners front it — Standing comes from the name, the work can come from anywhere.
A partner being interviewed for content on a video call

Asking partners to write has been tried at your firm already, and you know how it went.

.
Ghalib Ashrafi Founder & Digital Strategist · 12+ years across search, social & web

What we run for a firm

Six things, and the first one costs twenty minutes a month.

01

The Twenty-Minute Interview

Recorded, on a question they have been asked repeatedly. Turned into four or five posts in their voice, which they read and correct. It is the only format that survives a billable week.

02

Patterns, Never Matters

The recurring mistake, the misunderstood deadline, the question that arrives too late. The most valuable content a firm can publish and it identifies nobody.

03

Scope Written In

How it usually works, and the situation where it does not. Defensible, more useful than hedging, and the framing that makes senior people willing to put their name on it.

04

Juniors Research, Partners Front

Standing comes from the name; the work can come from anywhere. It gives your junior team real involvement without asking a prospective client to trust an unfamiliar one.

05

A Firm Account That Is Practical

Deadlines, changes people need to know about, what the firm actually does. Useful rather than personable, because giving a logo a personality is how it becomes a noticeboard.

06

Measured on Conversations

Enquiries and who mentioned seeing it, not engagement. A small audience of exactly the right people is the entire objective here and reach figures actively mislead.

20 minsPartner time, per month
PatternsWhat gets described, never matters
Their nameWhose voice it goes out in
0Clients named without permission

What clients say

Real clients, quoted in their own words — published with their permission.

More of them, in full, on our reviews page.

— Our Proprietary Methodology —

The Visibility Framework™, applied in Professional Services

The method doesn’t change by market. What it’s pointed at does.

Step 01

Audit & Listen

Existing accounts, competitor feeds, audience demographics and every comment and review already written about you. Ends with a recommendation on which platforms to keep.

Step 02

Position & Plan

Content pillars, brand voice, visual direction and a first calendar — agreed with you before a single post is produced.

Step 03

Produce & Publish

Shooting, editing, writing, scheduling and replying. The part that has to happen every week without fail, which is where most in-house efforts quietly stop.

Step 04

Amplify & Refine

Budget behind proven pieces, formats that underperform dropped, and the calendar rewritten monthly around what the data actually said.

Honest, No-Nonsense Commitment

Nobody controls a platform’s algorithm, so we will never promise you a viral post or a follower number. What we do commit to: the agreed content volume ships every month, every comment and DM is answered inside the agreed window, and if we miss either, that month is on us.

Investment

Social Media Management pricing for Professional Services, in USD

Priced monthly against a stated number of interviews, because that is the input the whole thing depends on and it is the one that slips. If the interviews stop happening we will say so rather than filling the gap with content nobody at the firm stands behind.

One Voice

A single partner, properly supported.

$900 / month
  • One twenty-minute interview a month
  • Four to five posts in their voice
  • Firm account kept practical and current
Get a Quote

Firm-Wide

Multiple practice groups or offices.

$5,000+ / month
  • Per-group voices with shared standards
  • A written position on personal accounts
  • Coordination with events and business development
  • Optional: combine all 4 services for full-funnel growth
Get a Quote

Every plan is scoped around your market — get a free audit and we’ll recommend what fits, priced in USD.

What you’re actually committing to

Most agencies keep this in a contract you only see after the sales call. We would rather you knew now, because it is the question everyone asks second — right after the price.

  • A 3-month initial term, then month to monthThree months is the shortest period in which a content approach can be judged honestly — month one is mostly setup and production. The wider industry standard is 6 to 12 months.
  • 30 days’ notice to stopNo exit fee and no buy-out of the months you haven’t used. You leave when you decide to, not when the contract lets you.
  • No setup or onboarding feeThe audit is free, and month one costs exactly what month two costs. Nothing is front-loaded.
  • You own everythingAccounts, page roles, ad accounts, raw footage and every finished asset — in your name from day one, and still yours if we part ways.
  • Ad spend never touches our invoiceYou pay the platform directly and keep the billing under your own control. Our fee is our fee.
  • An agreed response windowThe time we commit to replying to comments and DMs is written into your agreement, not left to goodwill.

These are the terms as they appear in the agreement itself — nothing here is softened for the website. The full wording lives in our terms and conditions, and you get the agreement to read before anything is signed or invoiced.

Professional Services Social Media Management questions, answered

Our partners will not write posts. What do we do? +
Stop asking them to. Twenty minutes on a recorded call about a question they have been asked repeatedly produces four or five posts in their voice, which they then read and correct. That is a realistic ask on a billable week; writing is not, and it has already been tried at your firm.
A great deal, once you separate the matter from the pattern. You cannot describe a client’s situation and you can describe the mistake that keeps appearing in a type of contract, the thing people misunderstand about a deadline, the question that arrives too late to help. That is the most valuable content a professional firm can publish and it identifies nobody.
They are right to, and that caution is not something to talk them out of — being publicly wrong about your own specialism has a real professional cost. The answer is to be specific about scope rather than vague about substance: "this is how it usually works, and here is where it does not" is defensible, more useful than hedging, and it is what makes senior people willing.
Both, doing different jobs. Individuals carry the thinking, because that is what people follow and where standing lives. The firm account handles the practical: deadlines, changes people need to know about, what the firm actually does. Trying to give a logo a personality is how an account becomes a noticeboard.
They can do most of the work and it should still go out under a name with standing. Juniors researching and drafting while partners review and front it gives your team real involvement without asking a prospective client to trust somebody they have no reason to trust yet.
That page is about the website being true — a team page listing people who left is checkable evidence that you are out of date. This is about who is willing to speak at all. Related, and the second one is the harder problem.
Keep Exploring

Related Social Media Management pages

Same service, different angle — by market, by discipline and by platform.

Get A Free Firm Social Review

Send us your firm account and two partner profiles. We will tell you which is doing any work, and what a single twenty-minute interview could produce.

Ready to stop asking partners to write?

Free 30-minute audit · No obligation · Response within 24 hours

Get in touch with Ghalib Ashrafi HQ

Ghalib Ashrafi takes on work for brands in six markets — the UK, USA, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Australia and Pakistan. Every enquiry gets a reply within 24 hours.

Phone / WhatsApp: +92 343 2653224
Email: info@ghalibashrafi.com
Hours: Mon–Sat, 10am–7pm (PKT)
Still deciding? Get a free social media audit — no obligation. Get Free Audit